The New York State United Teachers
describes a proposed charter school in Albany this way:
"The proposed Green Tech High would be the first charter high school in the city. The environmentally themed school for boys is slated to open in 2007 with 75 ninth-graders, eventually growing to 300 students in grades 9-12.
"Similar in concept to a magnet school, Green Tech High's curricula would focus on the region's natural resources, such as the Pine Bush preserve, Adirondack Mountains and Hudson River. The school would offer an Advanced Placement course in environmental studies, as well as two hours of English and 90 minutes of math per day. The school day would run from 7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., with a 200-day year.
"If approved, it would be the ninth charter school in the city of 94,000. Six are already operating; two more are slated to open next year. Like many Albany charter schools, Green Tech High has strong ties to the Brighter Choice Foundation, which was founded by Tom Carroll and receives millions from conservative education foundations and the federal government to promote charter schools.
"M. Christian Bender, who is heading the Green Tech board of directors, is executive director of the Brighter Choice Foundation, which operates two single-sex schools for elementary-level students in Albany. Brighter Choice Foundation, which is using a five-year $3.4 million federal grant to promote parental choice and launch charter schools, is under contract to buy the land for Green Tech High near a city nature preserve and help finance construction of the school."
OK. The first charter high school in the city, an environmental theme, AP courses, lots of English and math, extended day and year, plenty of financial backing, plus construction in an appropriate area for the school's mission.
The obvious conclusion for NYSUT: "Citing the cumulative financial strain of another charter school, the union and Albany city schools officials are urging the State University of New York Board of Trustees to deny the Green Tech application."
"They're siphoning off nearly 20 percent of our kids and our funding," said Albany Public Schools Teachers Association President Bill Ritchie. "We're at the saturation point where someone has to say enough is enough."
The basis of the union's opposition? "Our fixed costs remain the same. It's not like we can eliminate a fourth-grade class and achieve savings," Ritchie said.
Ah yes, the marginal per-pupil spending argument rears its head again. But, as EIA
highlighted back in November 2003 (item #4), if marginal costs are so low that regular public schools don't save the full per-pupil amount when a single student leaves, why do we give regular public schools the full per-pupil amount when a single student
enrolls? You can't have it both ways.
It's difficult to take NYSUT's arguments seriously. Especially when,
in a different article, NYSUT President Dick Iannuzzi inadvertently reveals his standards for what constitutes a good charter school.
"With almost 100 charter schools established in New York state, there are very few success stories," he wrote. "The United Federation of Teachers Elementary Charter School in Brooklyn , however, is one that shows great potential. The school is run by the UFT, NYSUT's largest affiliate. It opened in September with 150 students in kindergarten and first grade and will eventually add grades two through five. Early indications are that the school, with its staff 100 percent UFT members, is off to a good start."
The position of the teachers' unions on charter schools has been incoherent for at least the last 10 years. Maybe they should figure out what they think, before they try to persuade us to think the same way.