Education Intelligence Agency

Public education research, analysis and investigations

Are NEA, SEIU and AFSCME Working on “No Raid” Agreement?

Written By: Mike Antonucci - Dec• 10•12

December 10, 2012

1)  Are NEA, SEIU and AFSCME Working on “No Raid” Agreement? It’s no secret that the National Education Association is working more closely than ever before with its counterparts in organized labor. NEA, SEIU and AFSCME teamed up to fund a series of ads targeting key lawmakers in the fiscal cliff negotiations and they are the driving force behind today’s “day of action” rallies in a number of cities.

While three of the largest public employee unions in the nation are cooperating on external communications and operations, they are also crafting an internal agreement that would establish a détente over competition for members. A group of high-level NEA officials met with teams from SEIU and AFSCME last week to put together a deal that would establish jurisdictions for the individual unions, similar to the arrangement NEA made with AFT after the failed attempt at national merger in 1998.

The two national teachers’ unions and many of their state affiliates made “no raid” agreements – pledges not to try to recruit the other organization’s members. There have been hiccups along the way and a number of affiliates that refused to go along, but for the most part the cutthroat competition for members is a thing of the past.

SEIU and AFSCME don’t represent teachers, but they sometimes compete with the teachers’ unions for education support employees. Nevertheless, it shouldn’t be too much of a hardship for each side to agree to stay away from the other’s members. Once that’s in place, it will pave the way for all the public sector unions to cooperate more frequently and efficiently.

The days when NEA stood far apart from the broader labor movement are gone. The AFL-CIO was once shunned by NEA delegates, but now more than one-quarter of NEA members are affiliated with the labor federation. This helps NEA in projecting political power, but could hurt its “professional association” image and embroil it in issues far removed from education.

Today’s union movement is almost entirely a public sector union movement. It only stands to reason that the largest public sector union would take a larger part.

2)  Last Week’s Intercepts. EIA’s blog, Intercepts, covered these topics from December 4-10:

*  And They Lived Happily Ever After. The moral of the story is: Don’t get mad. Get even.

WEAC Approves Moving Forward With Merger. Suppose we get to 10 or 12 merged state affiliates. Then what?

Teacher Misconduct Bill a Test Case for California Legislature. Moderation or tidal wave?

Going Mobile. Reading Intercepts on your phone just got a little easier.

Canadian Teachers’ Union Wants to Put Its Members in the Penalty Box. But it probably won’t get away with it.

3)  Quote of the Week. “A new, satirical video titled ‘Tax the rich: An animated fairy tale’ was created by the California Federation of Teachers, not by the California Teachers Association. Some media have confused the two organizations.” – from a December 6 California Teachers Association press release.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.