1) New Hampshire Staff Settles After
Bitter Negotiations. The staff union of NEA New Hampshire approved a
contract that provided pay hikes of 10.5 percent over three years and
improved benefits after long and difficult negotiations that staffers blame
on Executive Director Dennis Murphy. Murphy, who formerly held the position
of lobbyist for NEA NH, was promoted to executive director after his
predecessor took a job at NEA headquarters.The staff union claims Murphy
strung out negotiations by hiring an outside attorney who demanded
reductions in staff benefits and expense accounts. The unnamed attorney had
previously represented school districts in contract negotiations against NEA
New Hampshire local affiliates. Staffers held informational picketing of
union headquarters in Concord during the summer and credited the support of
local union officials for their success.
2) Washington Staff Gets Two-Year Deal with Moderate Raises. EIA has
learned that the recently settled negotiations between the Washington
Education Association and its staff resulted in a two-year agreement, with
average raises described as "just under" the cost of living -- about 3
percent — although professional staffers at the top of the scale reportedly
did slightly better. WEA managers were unable to negotiate any of the
benefit reductions they were looking for, but they seem to be more than
satisfied that they held the line on salary hikes.
3) NEA and AFT to Release Joint Report on ESEA Next Summer.
Implementation of the new Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) at
the local and state levels continues to dominate the attention of both NEA
and AFT. High ranking officials from both unions were notified of a joint
NEA-AFT effort to collect data on the first year of ESEA, to be used in a
report for release in 2003 at the end of the school year. The unions plan to
use the report to support their case for modifications of the federal law.
4) Baltimore County Makes Latest Attempt to Snuff Out Black Market in
School Choice. Several times in the past, EIA has reported on the
phenomenon of parents lying about their place of residence in order to place
their children in better public schools, and the extraordinary efforts of
school district officials to halt the practice. The latest to join the
crackdown is the Baltimore County schools in Maryland.
Some principals in the district estimate that as many as 5 to 10 percent
of their students are ineligible to attend their schools. Most of these
students come from the city of Baltimore, which has the same problems
associated with most inner-city school districts. Baltimore County parents
made it clear they don’t want those students in their school system. "When
you allow that to happen, you allow those behaviors to come in -- negative
behaviors," community activist Ella White Campbell told the Baltimore Sun.
Superintendent Joe A. Hairston vowed to put 35 staffers to work on the
problem. The task force would check student records, pay visits to listed
county residences, and examine tax rolls to confirm residency claims.
5) Table Manners in Georgia Constitute an Emergency. School officials
in DeKalb County, Georgia, are to be commended for their decision to offer a
pilot program in dining etiquette to their high school students. What’s
harder to defend is the decision of Gov. Roy Barnes to devote $7,000 from
the state’s "emergency fund" to help pay for it.
Reporter John McCosh of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution uncovered
the questionable payment, as well as dozens of others, made from a fund
created to expedite the movement of state money to local communities struck
by fires, tornadoes or other natural disasters. Even school administrators
from DeKalb County, which has a $706.5 million operating budget, were
puzzled by the source of the state’s largesse. "That’s damn strange that we
have emergency etiquette," said county schools spokesman Spencer Ragsdale,
evidently angling for the "Understatement of the Year" award.
6) Columbus Disaffiliation Effort Causing Confusion in Ohio. On
August 19, EIA reported on a disaffiliation effort by the leaders of the
Columbus Education Association. Details were scarce then, as they are today,
four weeks later. While the disaffiliation attempt is the subject of much
internal discussion within the hierarchy of the Ohio Education Association (OEA),
none of those officially involved care to share their thoughts with EIA.
Nevertheless, EIA has learned that the Columbus local, nationally known
for its Peer Assistance and Review program for classroom teachers, is
seeking only to disaffiliate from Central OEA, a regional affiliate of the
OEA. In Ohio, as is true with several other states, NEA locals cluster to
form regional affiliates. These regional affiliates then send
representatives to the OEA Representative Assembly, which sets policy for
the state union.
Since Columbus is a large local, it sees itself as contributing a greater
share of Central OEA’s $600,000 budget than it receives in services
rendered. About one-third of Central OEA’s expenditures are for staff and
officer salaries, fringe benefits and stipends -- this in addition to the
staff provided through national and state dues.
What, if anything, Columbus’s actions will mean in the larger scheme of
things is uncertain. Even OEA and Central OEA seem unsure of the
ramifications, as they seek guidance on the issue from their own attorneys.
EIA will continue to track the story.
7) Recommended Reading. EIA is certain this didn’t turn up on
anyone’s recommended 9/11 lesson plans, but an excellent article by Thomas
Jewett deserves consideration because it has actual academic content (!).
"Terrorism in Early America" details the events of the mostly forgotten
Tripolitan War. Those with an interest can find it at http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/2002_winter_spring/terrorism.htm
8) Quote of the Week. "The school has an interest to protect." --
Steve Wood, president of Benton County School of the Arts board in Arkansas,
explaining the board’s new policy that prohibits teachers and other school
employees from talking to reporters. The board, by a 5-0 vote, approved new
rules that require all reporters’ questions be directed to Woods. Woods
exempted board members from the policy, saying it would restrict their
freedom of speech. (Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Sept. 10, 2002).