Education Intelligence Agency

Public Education Research, Analysis and Investigations

 
     
Home
Blog
Communiqué
Archives
Video Intercepts
School District Spending
Declassified
Dead Drop
About EIA
Contact
   

 

March 17, 2003

1)  EIA Report Ranks Per-Pupil Spending in Over 14,000 School Districts. Last Tuesday, the U.S. Census Bureau released Public Education Finances 2001, a 99-page report that highlighted school revenues and expenditures for the 2000-01 year. The report is a treasure trove of information, providing not only statewide averages for various spending, but extensive tables for the largest school districts. The report’s statistics received substantial media attention nationwide.

But if the Census Bureau report itself is overflowing with numbers, imagine the sheer bulk of the source data it used for the report. To compute statewide average expenditures, the Census Bureau gathered financial information from each of America’s nearly 15,000 local school districts. Armed with this source data, EIA has constructed a report of its own, What Price They Will: Per-Pupil Spending & Labor Costs for More Than 14,000 Public School Districts.

The report ranks school districts within each state on their 2000-01 per-pupil spending, and includes the percentages of that total they spent on instruction, total employee compensation, and compensation for classroom personnel only. The tables also include the enrollment figures for each district, so that comparisons with districts of similar size can be made. Each page also contains the state and national averages in each of the above categories for easy reference.

Links to each state’s table can be found at http://www.eiaonline.com/districts.htm You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view, print or download the tables. Your download time will depend of the number of districts in that state. Even the largest table, however, is only 27 pages long. If you wanted to print all 52 tables, it would eat up about 250 pages.

2)  NEA’s Columbus Local Seeks to Add AFT Affiliation. Ohio’s Columbus Education Association continues to blaze its own trail when it comes to relations with its parent organizations. Last September, EIA reported on the union’s decision to disaffiliate from Central OEA, its regional parent, and affiliate directly with the state organization. Now the 5,400-member NEA affiliate is seeking dual national affiliation, as it has applied for a charter from the American Federation of Teachers.

NEA and AFT already have a number of merged state and local affiliates, but AFT has no local in Columbus. Current union guidelines don’t address a procedure for a local to simply get a charter from the other national teachers’ union without dropping its current affiliation. NEA and AFT officials are hashing out an agreement so Columbus can get its wish. Money would obviously be a key issue. Would Columbus teachers have to cough up additional money to pay AFT dues, or would NEA forego a portion of the dues it gets from Columbus and pass it to AFT?

3)  Estimated 30,000 Teachers Get Layoff Notices in California. On February 12, The Oregonian reported on a two-day teacher’s job fair being held in Portland. Representatives from California’s public school districts were signing up recruits. “It is the promise of California, a state with a glut of teaching jobs it must fill,” wrote reporter Jim Tankersley.

A month later, the Los Angeles Times reports that as many as 30,000 California public school teachers are receiving layoff notices – enough to staff the entire state of Oregon with teachers. This is only the cherry on top of the giant hot fudge sundae of nonsense going on in the Golden State.

Because of seniority rules, the teachers who will ultimately be laid off are those the state and local districts just spent millions of dollars to recruit and train. And the reaction from the California Teachers Association (CTA) promises more wasted money. The union notified members who received layoff notices that they “are entitled to a hearing before an administrative law judge where the district must prove it had legal grounds for the layoff.”

School boards and administrators are also looking to alter the state’s class-size reduction program. A proposed bill would allow them to still receive state funding for the program if the school averages 20 students per K-3 class, rather than the current requirement of no more than 20 students in each and every K-3 class. One consulting service estimates this legislation would save $200 million statewide annually. CTA President Wayne Johnson called the bill “a slippery slop to oblivion,” although the California Federation of Teachers supports the bill. “In budget times like this… we believe you ought to give districts as much leeway as possible,” said CFT spokesman Mike Weimer.

At the same time CTA is opposing flexibility for districts on class size, it is putting its full weight behind a bill that would allow districts flexibility in deciding whether to implement the state’s high school exit examination. Assemblywoman Loni Hancock, who is carrying CTA’s bill, said “I think in (budget-cutting) times like these, you need to leave more and more flexibility to local districts.”

CTA officials aren’t the only ones whistling the theme from “Lost in Space.” Last week, the California Assembly spent 45 minutes debating a bill with a provision to refer to lousy schools as “high priority” rather than “low-performing.” It passed, 51-22. This move came years too late for manufacturers of the Yugo, who could have launched an ad campaign calling their car “Your High Priority Automobile.”

4)  Ontario Union Holds Convention and Hockey Game Breaks Out. The Ontario English Catholic Teachers Association held its annual convention last week and, unlike the NEA, decided boring policy speeches weren’t entertaining enough. Upset with the answers they received during a meeting with Education Minister Elizabeth Witmer, a band of “angry teachers punched, jostled and threw water on” her, according to several published reports.

The incident occurred after Witmer’s planned open address to convention delegates was changed to a question-and-answer session closed to the press. The attendees were reportedly hostile to Witmer’s responses. After taking three questions, Witmer decided she had had enough and left. According to the National Post, Witmer was then “chased up an escalator by about two dozen people,” some of whom wore paper bags over their heads. As her aides tried to escort her through the crowd, the punching and water-throwing occurred.

The union eventually issued an apology, although not all participants were contrite. One letter-writer to the Toronto Star, who claimed to be an eyewitness, said “the anger demonstrated at this meeting is steeped in the chronic underfunding of education by this government and its continued dishonesty on the subject with the public. After coming to a meeting 15 minutes late because she considered it more important to entertain a media opportunity outside, after refusing to answer honest questions, after insulting delegates by calling them liars, Witmer and her handlers craft a story about being chased out of a meeting and make an allegation about punches being thrown.”

5)  Australia Also Wonders About Teacher “Shortage.” International comparisons of public education are fraught with hazards, but international comparisons of education journalism are less so. The Australian press, for example, seems to be asking questions about the conventional wisdom in public education in a much more direct and forthright way than the American press does. Case in point: a March 5 article by Seamus Bradley in the newspaper The Age, headlined “The Teacher Shortage – Crisis or Con?”

Bradley goes down the list of competing interest groups and their competing claims on whether there is a teacher shortage in Australia or not. The numbers each side musters are persuasive, but, just as in America, it is the human cost of being wrong about shortages that catches the eye.

“The Federal and State governments’ no-crisis claim is backed up by scores of teachers who can’t find jobs,” Bradley writes. “Most days they can be heard on talk-back radio telling tales of how the system ritually humiliates them in their search for work. Several have phoned and written to The Age, outraged at reports of a teacher shortage when so many qualified people can’t even find part-time employment. Many say they feel they were conned into joining the profession with the promise of plentiful jobs and a slick $1.5 million State Government advertising campaign.”

Teaching is not day labor. Declaration of a “shortage” must be based on the best estimates of the employment situation at least a year from now, because of the time involved in going through the training pipeline. How could school administrators have gone so wrong, so fast?

6)  Vote Turnout Not an Internal NEA Priority. One of the things that make teachers’ unions such a political powerhouse is their ability to identify voters and get them to the polls. Their methods for doing so are legendary – which makes their failure to turn out voters for internal union elections all the more curious.

The Education Support Employees Association of Clark County, Nevada, in the midst of a representation battle with Teamsters Local 14, claims about 5,000 members. Yet its elections produced a total of no more than 227 votes. Similarly, NEA New Mexico (about 6,700 active members) generated no more than 273 votes in its recent statewide elections. That’s a 4.1 percent turnout. EIA estimates that if you added up all of NEA New Mexico’s statewide officers, state reps, local officers and site reps, the number would almost certainly exceed 273. This suggests that even union activists aren’t voting.

Are these two examples representative or anomalous? Who can say? Most teacher union affiliates do not elect state leaders by rank-and-file vote, and most do not release turnout figures for local elections.

7)  Quote of the Week. “If they succeed with this, the ideologues of the right will have their way. Government will be much smaller and employees will have no say in what happens to them.” –  Mark Neimeiser, chief lobbyist for the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) in Florida, commenting on a paycheck protection bill working its way through the state legislature. (March 17 Tallahassee Democrat)

   

Copyright Education Intelligence Agency. All rights reserved.