Education Intelligence Agency

Public Education Research, Analysis and Investigations

 
     
Home
Blog
Communiqué
Archives
Contract Hits
School District Spending
School Pay & Staffing
Dead Drop
About EIA
Contact
   
January 23, 2006

1)  NEA Looking to Play Larger Role in U.S. Presidential Primaries. The National Education Association is considering holding a U.S. Presidential nominating convention for its activists in 2007. Delegates to the convention would be given the choice of recommending a candidate from one, both, or neither of the major political parties.

The idea arose from the union's experience in the 2004 election, when the California Teachers Association, among others, recommended Howard Dean in the Democratic primary, while Michigan Education Association President Lu Battaglieri personally endorsed John Kerry, and NEA remained neutral until Kerry won the nomination. The union hopes to hold the convention no later than October 2007, before the Iowa caucus in January 2008.

The union's Representative Assembly in July 2008 will still vote up or down on NEA's recommendation in the general election.

The delegates to the nominating convention will be limited to the NEA board of directors and members of the union's PAC Council, which includes the state affiliate presidents and the leaders of various NEA special interest caucuses. NEA expects this will total some 370 participants.

According to the current plan, the convention "should be open to the media and, space permitting, to NEA members and their families."

Presidential candidates will be allowed to address the delegates, then field questions.

2)  Union Membership Rate Drops Again in 2005. Bureau of Labor Statistics figures for 2005 showed a slight drop in the percentage of American workers who belong to labor unions. BLS reported the percentage as 12.5, which is the same as it was in 2004, but extending the number of decimal places shows a drop from 12.52 percent in 2004 to 12.46 percent in 2005.

Intercepts has some interesting figures computed from the BLS data, but here are a few more:

* We are fast approaching the day when there will be more public sector union members than private sector union members. Of the 15,685,000 union members in the United States, only 52.6 percent work in the private sector. The number of local government employees (teachers, police officers, firefighters) who belong to a union grew by 106,000 in 2005 – more than doubling the union membership growth in the entire American private sector.

* Public education employees make up about 21 percent of all union members in the United States.

* The future looks bleak. The highest unionization percentages are found with workers 45 years of age and older. Among all workers between the ages of 25 and 34, only 10.7 percent are unionized.

3)  No Chance of NEA Joining Change to Win. Last summer there were a lot of uninformed rumors of NEA considering joining Change to Win, the coalition of labor unions that left the AFL-CIO. EIA shot them down then, even though Change to Win officials were meeting with NEA, and have continued to do so.

The emergence of Change to Win has given NEA an opportunity in the wider world of organized labor. NEA has been shut out of direct membership in AFL-CIO's central labor councils and other umbrella groups because it didn't belong to the federation, while AFT did. Now that Change to Win and AFL-CIO have come to a new agreement about non-AFL-CIO unions participating in those bodies, the door is opened for NEA to join them, too.

NEA leadership is working on an agreement with both AFL-CIO and Change to Win that would allow NEA participation on central labor councils, and create jurisdictional boundaries and no-raid agreements, but would not require that NEA enter into any affiliation with either of the two national labor federations.

Such an arrangement would seem to be tailor-made for NEA, allowing it involvement in Big Labor conversations without alienating its own large anti-AFL-CIO-affiliation constituencies. The only potential monkey wrench might be the payment of dues to such councils, but EIA suspects NEA will leave the money matters for local and state affiliates to decide on their own.

4)  NEA: Champion of Collective Thinking. EIA isn't a big fan of mission statements, strategic conferences or organizational vision documents. So when I heard the news several months back that NEA was working on defining its core values for the future, and calling the effort NEA Tomorrow, it merely caused me to roll my eyes. And, having read the most recent draft of said mission statement, my reaction is the same.

But let's give credit where credit is due. The slogan that accompanies NEA Tomorrow is "Creating our future together through collective thinking and conversation."

My view is that "collective thinking" is an oxymoron, and that conversation in the midst of it is pointless, but can there be any doubt that NEA prizes collective thinking above all other things? Congratulations, NEA, for creating a slogan that describes your very essence.

5)  Walnut Valley Union Denies Almost Everything. The Walnut Valley Educators Association (WVEA) issued a second statement in response to the vandalism of school board members' homes last week.

"Let me first say, that the WVEA Leadership, Negotiations or Crisis Teams neither planned, participated in, orchestrated, encouraged or was involved in any way with these acts of vandalism," wrote WVEA President Jim Faren (emphasis in original). He added, "We must take a stand against vandalism directed at our own Board and administrators, but at the same time remain united because of these false allegations. The Board's emotional response has allowed this situation to spiral out of control."

I, for one, believe Faren. It is unlikely that the union's leadership would concoct such a transparent attack on board members. What is less believable is that neither Faren nor other union officials have any idea who was responsible, especially in light of what he said at the board meeting that preceded the vandalism. "WVEA will continue to impress upon our members rational and positive behavior during this campaign," Faren said. "But what individual groups or individuals may do could be out of our control."

Faren was remarkably prescient. The least he can do is explain to the authorities what led him to issue such a warning, and which individuals he had in mind when he issued it.

6)  Union Merger in Massachusetts Not Feasible. Last May, delegates of the Massachusetts Teachers Association (MTA) approved a new business item calling on the organization to study the feasibility of merging with the Massachusetts Federation of Teachers. After a series of procedural actions, the union's board concluded last month that such a merger was not feasible. MTA was one of the ringleaders of the opposition to the national NEA-AFT merger attempt in 1998.

7)  Check Intercepts First! As EIA's burgeoning blog, Intercepts, enters its sixth month of operation, it isn't entirely clear how much overlap there is between readers of the weekly e-mail Communiqué and daily readers of Intercepts. However, in the past few weeks several readers have wondered why certain stories did not appear in the Communiqué when, in fact, they had appeared in Intercepts.

So I thought I would take this opportunity to explain how I am trying to organize things. In the future, I would like Intercepts to be the home of all the daily newsworthy items, and the Communiqué to be the weekly home of EIA's original reporting, with as little overlap of stories as possible.

In terms of content, this would mean the Communiqué would end up with fewer, though longer, stories. In terms of your reading habits, it would mean e-mail subscribers might have to start checking Intercepts, or subscribing to Intercepts via RSS feed, to receive a full load of EIA reporting. I believe this is a better approach than having the Communiqué become a weekly digest of stories that have already appeared in Intercepts.

So bear with me as I try to find a suitable middle ground between the information revolution and ingrained habit patterns. Your comments, as always, are welcome.

8)  Quote of the Week. "I realize, of course, that not all members of the Chicago Teachers Union are Democrats, and it certainly is not my desire as an editor to produce a newspaper that is nothing more than a pipeline for one political party's message. However, it sometimes is hard to make positive comments about Republican officeholders when writing about the needs of folks employed in the public schools and who belong to labor unions. The fact is, most of the true friends of public education and of organized labor are Democrats." – John A. Ostenburg, editor of Chicago Union Teacher, the monthly organ of the Chicago Teachers Union. How many logical fallacies can you find in this quote?

 

© 2005 Education Intelligence Agency. All rights reserved.