1) NEA Admits, "Things Will Never Go
Back to the Way They Were." The National Education
Association took a body blow when it failed to recall Wisconsin Gov. Scott
Walker, but even before the results were known, the union's national
leadership recognized that the serious troubles it faced extended far beyond
a single state.
As reported here two weeks ago, NEA
plans a reorganization to concentrate its efforts on stemming the loss of
revenue and membership and establishing a better public image. Whether it
will succeed is open to debate, but judging by the budget numbers presented
to the union's representative bodies, NEA's lofty position as the most
powerful political force in education is in serious doubt.
The union's reorganization is being
introduced to NEA activists this way:
"After a year of unprecedented membership losses driven by
economic stresses and political attacks, the National Education Association
stands at a crossroads. Unlike in the past, our shrinking membership is not
the sole product of a down economy from which we could expect to eventually
recover. The forces impacting us are so strong that they have indelibly
changed our industry, the educational system, and society at large. Things
will never go back to the way they were. Attacks on collective bargaining
and the role of the union, the nation's changing demographics, education
reform efforts, and an explosion in the use of education technology and
online learning have radically changed the role of educators and the system
of educating our nation's students."
In response to these losses, NEA will
establish organizing as a "core function." Its rationale is the union's need
to address previous shortcomings in the area:
"This Core Function was
developed to address a challenge that has been building for years but that
was exacerbated and highlighted by the political hostility being faced by
public sector unions. That challenge revolves around membership, which first
manifested by declining growth and now has deteriorated into stark losses.
Member growth has not kept pace with growth among educators for a long time
and of utmost concern is that current and anticipated educator growth is in
areas where NEA's market share is lowest. The centerpiece of the work here
is to test effective value propositions for all membership classes, develop
a culture of organizing to drive more effective member recruitment,
retention, and relevance and by doing so, build Association and member
capacity. All resources, products and lessons learned will be disseminated
This is the first time I have seen NEA
its loss of market share even in the fat years. If unable to rely on
exclusivity provisions in collective bargaining agreements to boost and
maintain membership, NEA faces the same slow deterioration in member numbers
that has been the bane of private sector unions for decades.
I have culled the membership figures
from NEA's last four budget years to compare with the union's proposed
figures for the next two, to better illustrate the trends. NEA has around 3
million total members, but it has to budget based on full-time equivalents
because the merged state affiliates of Florida, Minnesota, Montana and New
York split their national dues (in varying percentages) between NEA and AFT.
What the following figures represent then, is the number of members NEA
budgeted for, without double-counting those who also belong to AFT. These
figures include retirees, students and agency fee-payers.
2010-11: 2,653,200 (-1.1%)
2011-12: 2,593,200 (-2.3%)
2012-13: 2,410,200 (-7.1%)
2013-14: 2,345,200 (-2.7%)
You have to go all the way back to
1999-2000 to find an NEA budget with membership projections as low as the
ones for 2013-14. NEA is planning for a cumulative loss of 346,000 full-time
equivalent active, working members from its high-water mark just three years
ago. That would be a drop of almost 15 percent.
The only budget category marked for
increases is aid to state and local affiliates, which is NEA's largest
expenditure. This will help faltering affiliates, but may also result in
throwing good money after bad into affiliates that might conceivably
disappear entirely without such subsidies.
If even NEA has come to the realization
that there will be no return to its salad days, we have already reached a
point I never thought we would see. Now it really is a battle over what
2) Last Week's Intercepts.
Intercepts, covered these topics from June 5-11:
the Recall: Six Things We Can Lay to Rest. Including the "union
WEAC Admits to Losing 20,000 Members. Eventually we'll find out if
they're telling the truth.
WEAC Pretending Nothing Happened. At some point after the polls closed,
the election became about John Lehman.
Introducing the "Reekies" for Most Noteworthy Post-Recall Comments. How
to back away from an election you yourself called.
The Creepy School District Border Patrol. Imagine the uproar if they
tried this to check the voter registration rolls.
Force Bake Sale Not a Great Day for Schools After All. Be careful what
you wish for.
3) Quote of the Week #1.
"No teacher or union leader wants anything but qualified and excellent
instructors in our classrooms. A ballot fight would be divisive and costly,
diverting public attention and resources from narrowing the achievement gap,
improving education funding and other priorities to help students succeed."
- Paul Toner, president of the Massachusetts Teachers Association, after
brokering a deal with Stand for Children Massachusetts that would allow
teacher effectiveness to take priority over seniority in personnel
decisions. In exchange, Stand for Children will drop a ballot initiative
with stricter language. (June 8
Quote of the Week #2.
"[Our members are] relatively disgusted." - Richard Stutman, president of
the Boston Teachers Union, speaking about the compromise. (June 9