Education Intelligence Agency

Public Education Research, Analysis and Investigations

 
     
Home
Blog
Communiqu
Archives
NEA + State
Affiliate
Finances
School District Spending
Declassified
About EIA
Contact
   

 

July 30, 2012

1)  Is NEA Surfing Its Own Pension Tsunami? The growing obligation to fund public employees' defined benefit pensions is the stuff of daily media stories and commentary, and is the constant headache of state governments and both political parties. Public sector unions defend these plans vigorously, but they also have to finance them for their own employees. While the National Education Association has its own share of short-term budget problems, the long-term picture also indicates shoals ahead.

The union staff pension fund covers virtually every permanent employee who works at NEA headquarters in Washington, DC, as well as participating workers in state and local affiliates. The current number of participants in the plan is unknown to outsiders, but the benefits are generous. NEA employees contributed nothing to their defined benefit plan, and were able to enjoy the best of both worlds, as NEA offered matching contributions to a voluntary 401(k) defined contribution plan as well.

Tough times led the national union to require employees hired on or after June 9, 2009 to contribute 3.5% of the pension amount, and the 401(k) plan was suspended in the latest budget.

The pension numbers are staggering, considering the number of employees/retirees involved must only amount to some several thousand. As of January 1, 2011, NEA had accumulated $644.7 million in pension liabilities, for which it had $556.3 million available. For that fiscal year, the union contributed $25.2 million to the staff retirement plan.

But those figures are a snapshot, and don't account for some important facts. Staff salaries rise over time, and with them the amount of pension contributions and liabilities. NEA estimates that with projected staff salary increases, its pension payout obligations are almost $700 million.

State governments have learned that these liabilities go from a problem to a catastrophe when the number of contributors to the plan decreases while the number of beneficiaries increase. The parallel issue at NEA is the loss of members, leaving the union with less dues revenue to fund rising staff pension liabilities.

Pension reform in politically difficult in every state, but is even more problematic internally for unions, since they are ideologically wedded to the defined benefit approach. The question for both states and unions is how happily younger employees will tolerate lesser benefits for themselves to fund better benefits for their elders.

2)  Questions About the AFT Convention. The American Federation of Teachers wrapped up its biannual convention in Detroit today, and a few items have me wondering:

a) How did AFT get its New York Times columnist to show up when NEA couldn't?

b) If AFT is changing to "solution-driven unionism," what does that make the current unionism?

c) It's not surprising that Vice President Joe Biden delivered essentially the same speech as he did to NEA, but couldn't the delegates dream up a different chant?

d) How did the mainstream media fail to identify exactly who was protesting Biden's speech?

e) Is it a good thing that AFT members can get a 25% discount on something like this?

3)  Last Week's Intercepts. EIA's blog, Intercepts, covered these topics from July 24-30:

*  NEA's Hiring!. And announces its digital engagement.

NY Times Enrollment Story Only Half the Picture. Immigration crackdowns leading families to flee Tucson and San Bernardino for... Las Vegas, Corona Norco and Cypress-Fairbanks?

Latest Twist in the Fresno Teachers Association Game of Thrones. They even called in the gold cloaks.

Behind the Scenes of NEA Charter School Organizing. Nothing to worry about.

Unfriend of Education. A fugitive Wisconsin Democrat flees the Wisconsin Democrats for a few days, but returns to the fold.

4)  Quote of the Week. "The numbers of teachers are going up faster than are the numbers of students. That is a ticking time bomb. With an economic downturn, the troubles with our economy, it's hard to picture how school districts can sustain that increase and pay for it. I don't see it as sustainable."- Richard Ingersoll, a professor in the Graduate School of Education and Sociology at the University of Pennsylvania. (July 26 Detroit News)

   

Copyright Education Intelligence Agency. All rights reserved.