A $1 million report by the
Center on Education Policy concludes that after five years and billions of dollars of federal government focus on higher reading and math scores, we have higher reading and math scores.
The average American might wonder why this is cause for celebration. Considering the federal government’s track record, I find it stunning, and I’m sure others of the libertarian and conservative persuasions feel the same way. U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy
isn’t confused about what it means, but other liberals seems thrown by the very idea that a federal program could actually produce tangible results. That isn’t what they’re used to.
Thus we have
AFT President Edward McElroy trying to square the circle by insisting the results are not due to the bloated, intrusive federal program enacted under a Republican President, but due to the bloated, intrusive federal program enacted under a Democratic President: “The upward trend dates from before the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), and we believe it is likely that these results primarily reflect standards-based reforms put in place in the 1990s.”
We haven’t heard from NEA yet about the report, and I suspect it’s because they’re wordsmithing the proper combination of taking credit for higher scores while denying NCLB pressure had anything to do with them.
Whatever. I happen to think that evidence of more kids being able to read and compute adequately is a good thing, regardless of the reason.