Why Public Sector Collective Bargaining Should Be Public

Because during contract negotiations in Stamford, Connecticut, someone might notice that the average teacher salary is about $80,000.

Because in Brevard County, Florida, someone might notice that more than $5 million designated for the employee health care trust fund was spent on an 8.5 percent teacher pay raise.

Because in Hawaii, someone might wonder if getting rid of school on Fridays is really that great of an idea.

Because in Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, someone might suggest that the union is filing multiple grievances to get negotiating leverage.

Because across America, someone might actually get to read the New Haven teacher contract before deciding how reformy it is. In the meantime, you can see that the New Haven Federation of Teachers didn’t emphasize the same areas as Randi Weingarten, Arne Duncan and the New York Times when discussing the contract internally.

First, from the September 15 minutes of the union’s executive board:

Dave updated the board on the highlights of the past meetings. The following are issues that have been agreed to:

  • There will be no non-union charter schools. All teachers will be union members.
  • Tenure laws will not be changed.
  • “Turnaround Schools” may be chosen by the BOE and become charter schools. No teachers will be laid off as a result of a school being chartered. There will be an “election to work” agreement which will outline the general parameters of this position. The extended work day, added responsibilities, and compensations will all be clarified and teachers will be informed up front.
  • There will be an Advisory council that will govern the school and provide teachers with many levels of involvement.
  • There will be Peer Assistance and Review program, which would include a “peer review person”, chosen by the union to model, assist teachers, and provide support.
  • The district will ultimately make the determination of tier schools. But still being discussed is the “ waiver of work rule” provision, which allows work rules to be changed if more than 75% of the staff agrees.

There will be committees formed this year to finalize issues so that this reform can be in place for the 2010 –2011 school year. One of the first agenda items is to survey teachers to assess their principals and the principals to assess their administrators as a way to impact change where needed.

Then, from the September 22 minutes of the union’s stewards’ meeting:

Contract negotiations:

The main points have been:

  • Minimum four year contract
  • Step movement for all
  • Minimal cost increase for medical benefits
  • No contract language change
    • Share/Bookmark

    5 Responses to “Why Public Sector Collective Bargaining Should Be Public”

    1. Ed is Watching » Transparent Negotiations: Bringing the Public into Public School Districts Says:

      [...] of the best and brightest, Mike Antonucci, today says yes — citing a series of cases of re-appropriated funds, school calendar changes, grievance [...]

    2. Rich Says:

      Why do you assume that making teacher bargaining public will do any of the things you cite? I was the president of a large urban local that bargained in public several times and the response from the public was a gigantic yawn.

      I am generally in favor of public bargaining, though all the posturing on both sides extends the process quite a bit. Having said that, I do not share your illusions that making bargaining public has more than a minimal impact on public awareness or public interest. Whether bargaining is open or closed, folks who want to know what is going on at the table can generally find out.

    3. Jim Stegall Says:

      When my elected officials sit down to bargain away my money I DEMAND to see EVERY step of the process. The fact that the media, or the public at large, is not enthralled by the proceedings (shame on them–especially the media) is absolutely irrelevant.

    4. S Elliot Says:

      hate to bring up a sore point, Jim, but it’s not your money until you earn it. Before that it’s mine, my neighbor’s, and anyone else other than exempted Democrats, who pay taxes.
      By the way, so are the taxpayers’ kids who are the reason you are in the classroom in the first place.

    5. Jim Stegall Says:

      Mr. Elliot, do you know what happens when one assumes?

      I’m a taxpayer, and that money my elected officials are bargaining away is very much indeed MY money. I earned it, turned it over to the government in the form of taxes with the expectation that it would be used for legitimate public purposes only, and its distribution open to public inspection and subject to public comment. There is only one reason why elected officials and union bosses would want to conduct negotiations in private, and that is to keep taxpaying citizens such as myself from knowing what kinds of deals they’re really making and why they’re making them. It’s rotten business, and it ought to be against the law.



    http://www.wikio.com BlogBurst.com Education Blog Directory