Intercepts

A listening post monitoring public education and teachers’ unions.

For NEA, It Could Have Been Worse… But Not Much Worse

Written By: Mike Antonucci - Nov• 03•10

Not to belabor the obvious, but a bad day for the Democrats is a bad day for the National Education Association’s political operations. NEA spent money on safe incumbents, so its overall record for 2010 won’t seem so bad, but in the candidate races all across the country where the union was heavily involved, particularly in the U.S. House of Representatives, it got shellacked.

Let’s begin with NEA’s targeted Congressional races, as reported by The Atlantic and Mother Jones. The Senate seems to be where the union did best, assuming Colorado and Washington remain Democratic. NEA also devoted significant resources to Harry Reid. On the other hand, NEA lost in Pennsylvania and Kentucky.

The House was another matter.

AZ-05: NEA loss
CO-03: NEA loss
FL-22: NEA loss
IL-17: NEA loss
NY-01: NEA win
NC-08: NEA win
OH-13: NEA win
PA-08: NEA loss
VA-05: NEA loss
TX-23: NEA loss

At the state level, key governorships and legislatures flipped to the GOP, former Arizona Education Association President Penny Kotterman was defeated in her bid to become state superintendent of public instruction, and many of the ballot initiatives on which NEA spent the most money went down to defeat.

In Massachusetts, the union helped defeat Question 3, which would have slashed the sales tax, and managed one important win in California (more on that in a minute), but lost big on an education funding initiative in Oklahoma, failed to pass a state income tax in Washington, and flushed away more than $10 million on a losing effort to increase revenue from the corporate business tax in California. The union also could not stop an Arizona initiative that requires secret ballots for union representation elections, effectively outlawing card check in the state.

In the Golden State we once again proved we live on an entirely different planet. The Wall Street Journal has already opined on the contrarian nature of the California vote. Not only did Jerry Brown and Barbara Boxer win handily, but it is likely that every statewide office will be held by a Democrat, and Democrats may also have increased their already lofty numbers in the legislature.

California voters seemed to call for fiscal responsibility, passing the union-opposed Props 22 and 26. The former prohibits the state from taking local funds to help balance the budget, and the latter requires a two-thirds vote for many fees that now require only a majority vote to increase. This removed two practices the legislature routinely uses to raise revenues.

At the same time, however, the voters approved the union-backed Prop 25, which eliminates the two-thirds supermajority to pass a state budget. This entirely erases the GOP as a factor on budget issues, and certainly does not signal a move toward austerity measures in a state awash in debt and bloated government.

It’s a political cliché that what begins in California soon spreads to the rest of country. For the next two years, at least, the opposite will be true. We will see things in California that will be seen nowhere else.

Nationally, NEA’s actions will be interesting to watch. After the 1994 mid-terms, the union hooked up with the Republican Main Street Partnership in an effort to make some GOP friends. It’s hard to imagine they’ll be able to attempt something similar next year.

UPDATE: NEA’s post-election statement here, and its rather short list of victorious “education champions” here.

Share

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

5 Comments

  1. […] of one house of Congress isn’t entirely clear. Though Mike Antonucci observes correctly that election night could have been worse for the NEA, but not much worse: Not to belabor the obvious, but a bad day for the Democrats is a bad day for the National […]

  2. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brandon Dutcher and Mekei, Michael Petrilli. Michael Petrilli said: Mike Antonucci: For NEA, It Could Have Been Worse… But Not Much Worse http://bit.ly/dpKLnG #edreform […]

  3. Darren says:

    As a teacher, I fear for the retirement check that I’ve been promised and have worked for for 14 years.

    I’m not the first to note that the results of yesterday’s election make it more likely California will need a federal bailout, and less likely that it will get one.

  4. […] defense of incumbent Democrat Rep. Tim Bishop in New York’s 1st district. It was one of NEA’s priority campaigns. The union specifically targeted Bishop’s Republican opponent, Randy Altschuler, with a radio […]

  5. DP, GA says:

    In the future, the Democratic Party in the South will likely be found in the cemetery. And the backlash exhibited towards the Democrats in this election will likely be directed at the public unions and its’ supporters in the next election.