Hawaii State Teachers Association president Wil Okabe was term-limited out this year, leading his vice president, Joan Lewis, to seek the post. She was challenged by Corey Rosenlee, a member of the union’s board of directors. Rosenlee ran on a slate from the Hawaii Teachers for Change caucus, who want to transform HSTA “from a business model union to an organizing union.”
There was a long delay in announcing the outcome of the election until finally HSTA told members there would be a runoff for the office of vice president. But the union didn’t disclose the actual vote counts, nor did it certify the results for president or secretary-treasurer.
The runoff was held, but in a marathon session on Saturday the union’s board of directors voted not to certify the results of either the first election or the runoff, citing unnamed irregularities.
This caused a firestorm of protest, particularly after secretary-treasurer candidate Osa Tui revealed he had lost the initial vote to Teachers for Change candidate Amy Perruso. Tui then withdrew from the race.
Angry activists are peppering the union’s Facebook page with demands for transparency, while conspiracy theories begin to float around. A Change.org petition has been posted calling for all details of the votes and the board meeting to be made public.
It’s still too early to call this type of thing a trend, but the days of simply anointing new union presidents do seem to be gradually coming to an end.
May 13, 2015 NEA Today: “Teacher Turnover Is Much Lower Than You Probably Think”
That’s interesting. Why would I think teacher turnover is high? Could it be because I was reading this stuff?
April 2, 2015 NEA Today: “Revolving Door Of Teachers Costs Schools Billions Every Year” “Over the next five years, nearly half of new teachers will transfer to a new school or leave the profession altogether – a revolving door of teacher turnover that costs school districts upwards of $2.2 billion a year.”
NEA Research Spotlight on Recruiting & Retaining Highly Qualified Teachers: “Some sources estimate that 50 percent of the teachers currently in our classrooms will either retire or leave the profession over the next five to seven years. The statistics for teacher turnover among new teachers are startling. Some 20 percent of all new hires leave the classroom within three years. In urban districts, the numbers are worse. Close to 50 percent of newcomers leave the profession during their first five years of teaching.”
December 17, 2012 story on NEA’s Education Votes site: “According to the National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future (NCTAF), teacher attrition has grown by 50 percent over the last fifteen years. Educators leave the profession now at a rate of 16.8 percent. Over 30 percent of young teachers leave the profession within the first five years.”
September 10, 2012 press statement from NEA president Dennis Van Roekel: “Currently, conditions in our schools are so difficult that almost half of all new teachers leave the profession in the first five years.”
March 31, 2011 editorial from NEA president Dennis Van Roekel: “Let’s do the math…. Nearly 50 percent of new teachers leave the profession in the first five years, and schools lose 100 percent of their investment.”
Apr 5, 2008 NEA Today: “Nationally, the average turnover for all teachers is 17 percent, and in urban school districts specifically, the number jumps to 20 percent, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. The National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future proffers starker numbers, estimating that one-third of all new teachers leave after three years, and 46 percent are gone within five years.”
March 14, 2008 NEA Today: “Nearly half of new teachers leave the classroom during the first five years of teaching—and, although the reasons are varied, low pay is certainly one of them.”
January 20, 2007 NEA Today for Tomorrow’s Teachers: “Just as one about to be married does not want to ponder the shocking statistic that nearly half of all U.S. marriages end in divorce, a soon-to-be teacher does not relish hearing that nearly half of all new teachers leave the profession within five years (in fact, some 20 percent leave after just one year).”
A March 19, 2000 New York Times story profiled two new Bridgeport, Connecticut teachers, Elena Pelaez and Gary DeBrizzi, and contained this quote: “But in a school district that loses up to one third of its new teachers every year, and in a nation where half of all new teachers quit within five years, according to the National Education Association, the chances of teachers like Ms. Palaez and Mr. DeBrizzi being in classrooms here a decade from now are slim.”
I could not determine if Ms. Pelaez is still teaching 15 years later, though I was able to locate several Elena Pelaezs who still teach Spanish. As for Mr. DeBrizzi, not only is he still teaching in Bridgeport, he is listed as the treasurer of the Bridgeport Education Association.
Because Matthew Ladner deftly eviscerated President Obama after his remarks at the Catholic-Evangelical Leadership Summit on Overcoming Poverty at Georgetown University.
The President made a thoughtful and reasoned argument about the free market, common goods and public investment. Unfortunately for him, he was actually describing the reality in some alternate universe (or perhaps, Alfie Kohn’s Planet Mongo).
I’ll turn the stage over to Ladner, and simply highlight a Heritage Foundation chart he used. He likes it because it shows where the money goes. I like it because it bolsters the sad reality that U.S. public education policy is a labor issue, not an education issue.
The Education Support Employees Association of Nevada (ESEA-NV) has no shortage of problems, what with Teamsters Local 14 poised to assimilate its members and its executive director resigning suddenly.
Tonight the union’s executive board will meet to discuss another matter: whether to approve the appointing of a review board to consider disciplinary action against president Doug McCain.
The nature of the allegations, made by board member Sally Tabat Duhancik, are undisclosed, but in his response McCain calls them “political” in nature.
If the board approves, formal hearings will be held, and if the review board rules against McCain, it has the de facto authority to censure, suspend or impeach him.
Without knowing the charges and considering the situation ESEA-NV is in, it seems unlikely to me that the board will want to devote its energy to an internal administrative proceeding. Nevertheless, at a time when it badly needs a united front, the union is evidently falling apart.