As of February 2015.
Or access through the EIA Declassified page here.
In case you needed to know.
Over on Flypaper, Michael J. Petrilli takes a look at the U.S. birth rate and comes to a conclusion that will either please or horrify classroom teachers.
Fewer first-graders, lower enrollment, and one of two things happens. Either class sizes shrink of their own accord, or education employees are laid off. Let’s hope we’re not in for another round of frenzied teacher hiring only to let them go two to three years later.
A proposal was made at the California Teachers Association State Council and referred to the union’s board of directors that CTA “offer free information and testing for Sexually Transmitted Diseases and the prevention thereof.”
No further details about exactly what this would entail were provided, but I hope it is supposed to take the form of some sort of voucher to pay for testing at a hospital, clinic or lab. There is no mention in the staff contract or job descriptions of CTA employees being required to check members for herpes, so I’m sure a grievance would be filed.
I was cleaning out the file cabinet this morning and came across some old source material, including three memos from 2003 that provided the basis of this EIA story in the wake of the FBI raid on the headquarters of the United Teachers of Dade on April 29, 2003.
You may recall that UTD president Pat Tornillo was arrested and charged with spending more than $650,000 of union dues on himself – buying things like luxury cruises and python-print pajamas. He reached a plea deal on mail fraud and tax evasion in exchange for a shorter prison term. Tornillo died in 2007.
The Tornillo memo to Florida Education Association chief of staff Aaron Wallace, written a mere 8 days prior to the FBI raid and cc’ed to every high-ranking officer in FEA, AFT and NEA, is defiant in tone and heavy with rationalization. Tornillo blames rival organizations, the media, district administrators and the union’s health care plan for his local’s financial difficulties, while claiming “UTD is solvent and has substantial reserves.”
Twelve years later, UTD is still $3.6 million in dues arrearage to FEA and AFT, and has a $2.4 million loan outstanding from AFT for operating expenses.
For many in the education establishment, Finland is the Promised Land. It’s a magical place where every child learns, every teacher is skilled and valued, unions are vital, money is no object, and unicorns poop rainbows.
It’s tempting to drill holes in these fantasies, but Tim Oates of Cambridge Assessment does a masterful job of bringing the Finnish education system into the real world while still celebrating its notable accomplishments. In “Finnish fairy stories,” Oates shows a lot of respect for the Finns, and not so much for the “education tourists” who, he says, “asked questions only about the things in which they are interested; they have ‘found’ what they have been looking for, and not understood the importance of things which they have not asked about.”
Oates then explains about Finnish testing and school evaluation, the national curriculum, private schools, and teacher pay. He cites a few problems that never make it into the glowing praise from foreigners: the closure of thousands of small rural schools, increased segregation in urban areas, and evidence that the nation’s academic standards peaked in 2000 and are on the decline.
Oates makes the key point that outside observers only seem interested in what Finland has been doing since it reached high international ranking, not what the nation did in the years of improvement. “The Finns effected wholesale, coherent system change,” he writes. “Moving an entire system to fully comprehensive education was an outstanding feat of social consensus, policy formation and meticulous, centralised implementation strategy. Look there – the past, not the present – for insights as to what another nation might aspire to do, and what means might be used to achieve it.”
Last weekend at the California Teachers Association State Council meeting a new business item was introduced and referred to the union’s board of directors. It asked that CTA “establish a workgroup to investigate overhauling punitive attendance laws.”
The sponsors explained:
Our current attendance laws disproportionately attack, fine, and imprison people of color and the poor. The criminalization of truancy often pushes students further away from school, and their families deeper into poverty. We are funding our system by fining the poor. We are jailing parents because their kids miss school. We are taking children out of their homes for poor attendance. We are withholding public aid to those in need to punish when their children are absent. Let’s work to figure out how our attendance laws can prevent absence, be supportive to everyone, to get and keep students in class.
Bravo! Everyone knows the unions respect the right of all parents to make decisions about their children’s education. If they decide not to subject their children to the state’s governmentally prepared standardized public schools they should suffer no adverse consequences.