NEA Policy Statement on Charter Schools – Final Version

NEA Policy Statement on Charter Schools
Adopted by the 2017 Representative Assembly, July 4, 2017


Charter schools were initially promoted by educators who sought to innovate within the local public school system to better meet the needs of their students. Over the last quarter of a century, charter schools have grown dramatically to include large numbers of charters that are privately managed, largely unaccountable, and not transparent as to their operations or performance. The explosive growth of charters has been driven, in part, by deliberate and wellfunded efforts to ensure that charters are exempt from the basic safeguards and standards that apply to public schools, which mirror efforts to privatize other public institutions for profit.

Charters have grown the most in school districts that were already struggling to meet students’ needs due to longstanding, systemic and ingrained patterns of institutional neglect, racial and ethnic segregation, inequitable school funding, and disparities in staff, programs and services. The result has been the creation of separate, largely unaccountable, privately managed charter school systems in those districts that undermine support and funding of local public schools. Such separate and unequal education systems are disproportionately located in, and harm, students and communities of color by depriving both of the high quality public education system that should be their right.

As educators we believe that “public education is the cornerstone of our social, economic, and political structure,” NEA Resolution A-1, the very “foundation of good citizenship,” and the fundamental prerequisite to every child’s future success. Brown v. Bd. of Ed. of Topeka, Shawnee Cty., Kan., 347 U.S. 483, 493 (1954). The growth of separate and unequal systems of charter schools that are not subject to the same basic safeguards and standards that apply to public schools threatens our students and our public education system.  The purpose of this policy statement is to make plain NEA’s opposition to the failed experiment of largely unaccountable privately managed charter schools while clarifying NEA’s continued support for those public charter schools that are authorized and held accountable by local democratically elected school boards or their equivalent.

I. NEA supports public charter schools that are authorized and held accountable by public school districts. Charter schools serve students and the public interest when they are authorized and held accountable by the same democratically accountable local entity that authorizes other alternative school models in a public school district such as magnet, community, educator-led or other specialized schools. Such charters should be authorized only if they meet the substantive standards set forth in (a) below, and are authorized and held accountable through a democratically controlled procedure as detailed in (b) below.

a. Public charter schools should be authorized by a public school district only if the charter is both necessary to meet the needs of students in the district and will meet those needs in a manner that improves the local public school system. Public charters, like all public schools, must provide students with a free, accessible, non-sectarian, quality education that is delivered subject to the same basic safeguards and standards as every other public school, namely, in compliance with: i) open meetings and public records laws; ii) prohibitions against for-profit operation or profiteering as enforced by conflict of interest, financial disclosure and auditing requirements; and iii) the same civil rights, including federal and state laws and protections for students with disabilities, employment, health, labor, safety, staff qualification and certification requirements as other public schools. When a charter is authorized in a public school district that has an existing collective bargaining agreement with its employees, the authorizer will ensure that the employees will be covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Those basic safeguards and standards protect public education as a public good that is not to be commodified for profit.

In addition, charter schools may be authorized or expanded only after a district has assessed the impact of the proposed charter school on local public school resources, programs and services,  including the district’s operating and capital expenses, appropriate facility availability, the likelihood that the charter will prompt cutbacks or closures in local public schools, and consideration of whether other improvements in either educational program or school management (ranging from reduced class sizes to community or magnet schools) would better serve the district’s needs. The district must also consider the impact of the charter on the racial, ethnic and socio-economic composition of schools and neighborhoods and on equitable access to quality services for all district students, including students with special needs and English language learners. The impact analysis must be independent, developed with community input, and be written and publicly available.

b. Public charter schools should only be authorized by the same local, democratically accountable entity that oversees all district schools such as a locally elected school board or, if there is no school board, a community-based charter authorizer accountable to the local community.

Maintaining local democratic control over decisions as to whether to authorize charters at all, and if so, under what conditions, safeguards community engagement in local public schools. A single local authorizing entity also ensures comprehensive consideration of whether each option, and the mix of options offered in a district, meets the needs of students and the community as a whole given the resources and facilities in the district. A single entity also permits effective integrated oversight of all schools, including charter schools, and a central mechanism for identifying and sharing successful innovations throughout local public schools.

The overall goal of the authorization and review process must be to improve the education offered to all students. That goal cannot be accomplished with a diffuse authorization system, comprised of multiple different entities, with differing partial views of the students served by a district and the overall scope of its educational offerings.

The local authorizer also must ensure that parents are provided with the same information about charters that is provided to parents about other district schools, as well as information about any significant respects in which the charter departs from district norms in its operations including the actual charter of the school.

The state’s role in charter authorization and oversight should be limited to ensuring that local school districts only authorize charters that meet the criteria in (a) above and do so by way of a procedure that complies with (b). To that end, the state should both monitor the performance of districts as charter authorizers and hold districts accountable for providing effective oversight and reporting regarding the quality, finances and performance of any charters authorized by the district. In addition, the state must provide adequate resources and training to support high quality district charter authorization practices and compliance work, and to share best authorization practices across a state. States should entertain appeals from approvals or denials of charters only on the narrow grounds that the local process for approving a charter was not properly followed or that the approval or denial of a charter was arbitrary or illegal.

c. Unless both the basic safeguards and process detailed above are met, no charter school should be authorized and NEA will support state and local moratoriums on further charter authorizations in the school district.

II. NEA opposes as a failed and damaging experiment unaccountable privately managed charters. Charters that do not comply with the basic safeguards and standards detailed above and that are not authorized by the local school board (or its equivalent) necessarily undermine local public schools and harm the public education system.

The theory that charter competition will improve public schools has been conclusively refuted.  Charters have a substantial track record that has been assessed in numerous research studies.  Those studies document that charters, on average, do no better than public schools in terms of student learning, growth or development. And those charters that do perform better are not incorporated into district-wide school improvement efforts.

In fact, at their worst, charters inflict significant harms on both students and communities. Of the charter schools that opened in 2000, a full fifth had closed within five years of opening and a full third had closed by 2010. Because the very opening of charters often prompts cutbacks and/or closures in local public schools, these alarmingly high charter closure rates subject students and communities to cycles of damaging disruption. Such disruption can leave students stranded mid-year. Even closures that occur at the year’s end disrupt students’ education and unmoors communities that previously had been anchored by the local public school.

Charters that are not subject to the basic safeguards and standards detailed above also open up the local public schools to profiteers. Such charters operate without any effective oversight, draining public school resources and thereby further harming local public schools and the students and communities they serve.

Finally, one particular form of unaccountable privately managed charters deserves specific discussion. Fully virtual or online charter schools cannot, by their nature, provide students with a well-rounded, complete educational experience, including optimal kinesthetic, physical, social and emotional development. Accordingly, they should not be authorized as charter schools.

III. Organizing Communities for Quality Public Education
NEA stands for our students wherever they are educated.  Relegating students and communities to unaccountable privately managed schools that do not comply with the basic safeguards and standards detailed above has created separate systems of charters that are inherently unequal.  To counter the threat to public education of such charters, NEA supports both communities organizing for quality public education and educators working together to improve charter schools.

a. NEA supports communities that are working to hold charters accountable whether that work takes the form of state legislative initiatives, local school board resolutions and actions, or efforts to raise local awareness of the need for charters to comply with the basic safeguards and standards detailed above. NEA also will support state and local efforts to preserve public school funding and services by eliminating such funding and services from unaccountable privately managed charters that do not comply with those basic safeguards and standards.

b. NEA believes that all educators deserve the right to collective voice and representation, and that an organized workforce is a better guardian of quality standards for students and educators alike. For that reason, state affiliates that seek to organize charter schools may continue to seek NEA’s assistance in those organizing efforts.


Could This Resolution Put NEA Out of Business?

Delegates will debate an amendment to NEA Resolution A-4, adding this language:

The Association further believes that public education should be publicly and democratically controlled, without undue influence in decision-making on the part of any private interests, including, but not limited to, business concerns and philanthropic organizations.

“Any private interests” would include NEA.


Updated: Fingers in Ears, Shouting “La, La, La, I Can’t Hear You!”

The delegates have worked their way through 34 new business items in the first two days. Only 125 to go.

Of the ones I listed yesterday, NBI 22 – about the union’s procedure for Presidential endorsements – was referred to the PAC Council amid some distress by a substantial group of delegates.

Some of the final NBIs are focused on dealing with opposing views.

New Business Item 111: The NEA will make available through the NEA website an ongoing, updated list of individuals, companies, and foundations that are actively engaged in funding and promoting (through conferences, media, and other means) educational positions that are contrary to the NEA Vision, Mission, Core Values, Policy Statements, and Resolutions. [Update: Withdrawn.]

New Business Item 113: I move that the NEA adopt an official position of objection to the “documentary” called School, Inc., a 3-hour program which aired in installments on PBS in June of 2017 and was funded by a foundation known to support vouchers and allied with Koch Brothers’ Americans for Prosperity and the Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation. And, that the NEA president contact PBS regarding School, Inc. to express counter points to this show. Finally, NEA members should be encouraged to contact PBS voicing their opinions on the showing of School, Inc. [Update: Approved.]

New Business Item 117: The NEA President will write a letter to the Inspector General to encourage the U.S. Postal Service to provide check-cashing services. [Update: Approved.]

New Business Item 125: The NEA shall only invite a National Teacher or an ESP of the year recipient who is an active union member to speak at the NEA Representative Assembly. [Update: Defeated.]

New Business Item 132: NEA will not accept monetary sponsorship or be affiliated with any foundation, corporation, or politician that is linked to the negative public education reform movement and/or has participated in the privatization of public education. A vetting system will be adopted by NEA to determine whether a foundation, corporation, or politician is or is not affiliated with the negative public education reform movement and/or participation in the privatization of public education. [Update: Referred to committee.]

The rationale for this one states, “How can we be the driving voice of public education when we corroborate (sic) with those that are working to destroy public education?”

New Business Item 133: I move that NEA develop resources for the organization of existing charter schools in all states where there are laws allowing them. Resources should include, but not be limited to, model contracts, forms, consortia, and a state strategy document that outlining specific steps each state should make in order to reach a goal of full charter unionization.

New Business Item 159: NEA shall hold an advisory vote at the RA during regular voting for NEA officers to indicate member choices for preferred presidential candidates in presidential primaries. Ballots would list candidates from all parties and members would have the option of choosing one candidate or choosing one preferred candidate from each party. (During the RA 16 months previous to the upcoming presidential elections.) [Update: Referred to committee.]


UPDATED: NEA Convention 2017: New Business Items on Charters, Political Endorsements & DeVos

Delegates to the NEA Representative Assembly have already submitted 105 new business items for debate and vote – 14 more than at this point last year. Some of note:

New Business Item 22: The NEA shall make no major political endorsements outside the Annual RA process. [Update: Referred to committee]

New Business Item 33: NEA calls for an immediate moratorium on charter school expansion, except for district dependent charters, but including private charters and charters privately managed but authorized by school boards. [Update: Superseded by provisions of new NEA policy statement on charter schools.]

New Business Item 47: NEA will develop and promote resolutions that local associations can introduce at school board meetings calling for county-wide and state-wide moratoria on new charter school authorizations in every state that has legislation authorizing the creation of charter schools. [Update: Superseded by provisions of new NEA policy statement on charter schools.]

New Business Item 48: NEA will educate and organize its members to defend public education from privatization by training them on how to identify, correct, and refute misinformation. [Update: Defeated]

New Business Item 52: NEA will request the resignation of Betsy DeVos as Secretary of Education. [Update: Approved, but with modification that DeVos has until 9/1 to satisfactorily answer questions posed in this letter.)

New Business Item 65: The NEA will support both the efforts in the Department of Justice and the U.S. Congress to constrain Donald Trump’s abuses of power and will participate in the ongoing actions of the movement of Resistance to Trump to defeat Trump’s abuses through the direct mobilization and action of the American people.

The NEA defends the independence and integrity of the ongoing investigations of Donald Trump, the Trump campaign, and the Trump presidency. The NEA also supports the efforts to begin the process of impeaching Donald Trump in the U.S. House of Representatives that could lead to his trial before the U.S. Senate. [Update: Delegates voted not to consider this item.]

New Business Item 92: The NEA leadership must discourage, through appropriate means and venues, the purchase and patronage of Trump-family-owned goods, services, and properties to include, but not limited to, hotels, casinos, country clubs, shoes, apparel, and cosmetics. [Update: Defeated.]

New Business Item 100: Direct the PAC Council to determine a workable method for canvassing membership regarding their preference for President and publicizing the results prior to the recommendation by the PAC council for President of the U.S. in 2020. [Update: Bundled with NBI 22 and referred to committee.]

New Business Item 101: The NEA RA directs the NEA to examine the economic effect of establishing a dues structure based on income for all members and report the cost effect on members. [Update: Referred to NEA Executive Committee]

New Business Item 104: I move that NEA shall develop a “Watch List” of Broad Superintendents including financial ties and corporate backers. The list shall be made available to state and local affiliates. [Update: Approved.]


Offered Without Comment

Tomorrow afternoon, delegates to the National Education Association Representative Assembly will debate and vote on the following resolution:

New H. The Role of the Press in a Democracy

The National Education Association believes that a strong and independent press is vital for a fully functioning democracy. Limits on access to information, threats to individual journalists or news outlets,
and coercion by elected officials or businesses cannot be tolerated. The Association also believes that open information laws must be vigorously enforced and that First Amendment rights of the press must be zealously protected.


California Union Staff to Hold Informational Picket at NEA Convention

Employees of the California Teachers Association have been negotiating for months with CTA managers to agree on a new contract, but talks have been contentious. A major sticking point is pension funding.

The staff union organized protests at various CTA events, including a State Council meeting earlier this month.

Now a handful of CTA employees will set up an informational picket line at the entrance to the NEA Representative Assembly hall in Boston next week in an effort to pressure CTA officers to settle their contract.

Although CTA has struggled to fully fund staff pensions, the union is flush with cash. The just-signed California state budget ensures that more will be on the way. Despite the current animosity, I expect CTA will settle soon and the staff will be generously compensated.