AFT press release here.
1) Thanks to NEA Alaska, Sex Harassment Doesn’t Have to Be About Sex
2) Ninth Circuit Rules for Employer Free Speech Regarding Unionization
3) AFT Raises the White Flag in Puerto Rico
4) Associated Press Covers Washington Staff Picket Line
5) No Stories on This Trend
6) The Best Union Story Ever
7) Quote of the Week
“Esta página está en proceso de remodelación.”
Thus ends AFT’s formal presence in Puerto Rico. As EIA has reported (exclusively for a long, long time — see here and here for example), AFT’s efforts to regain control of the disaffiliated Federación de Maestros de Puerto Rico (FMPR) have been defeated at every turn. The national union conceded defeat by shutting down the AFTPR web page with the above notice, and overnighting a letter to FMPR President Rafael Feliciano Hernandez on Wednesday, notifying him that AFT was revoking FMPR’s affiliation!
Additionally, the AFT Executive Council terminated the administratorship over FMPR (which never took practical effect anyway), and included a pointed reference to outstanding loans and back dues payments. AFT wants the latter repaid by next Friday. Good luck.
It bears repeating that it has been almost a full year since the FMPR disaffiliation vote, and following months of investigations, protests, rallies, lawsuits, an administratorship, court decisions, a referendum, and a charter revocation, you will still search in vain for any public statement about these events from AFT national headquarters. Can’t have the loss of 32,000 members undermine the message, can we?
It was a pretty bad week for unions in the normally accommodating U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Two cases that will reverberate. Tons of details from the court, and EIA has many to add — too many for this type of format. Let’s just say, “Stay tuned for Monday’s EIA Communiqué.”
Read the latest “Contract Hits.”
* The Landmark Legal Foundation, noted for filing federal complaints against NEA for violations of political expenditure reporting requirements, yesterday asked the California Public Employment Relations Board to investigate the California Teachers Association’s $54 million dues assessment.
In particular, Landmark questions the union’s characterization of the dues assessment as “debt retirement,” when the debt is obviously caused by political campaign spending. Non-members can be forced to pay the former, but not the latter. In either case, full dues plus assessments are deducted from all paychecks — member or non-member — with reimbursement of political expenses made to non-members upon their annual written request.
Since CTA’s attorneys determine which union expenditures are chargeable or non-chargeable (subject to challenge through arbitration or court filing) at the end of each fiscal year, it is not yet known whether the union planned to claim the assessment as a chargeable expense. The Landmark complaint ensures that that determination will be made in the public eye.
* Ormsby County Education Association President Jeff Greb and another union member were fined $15 each by the Nevada Ethics Commission for using class preparation time to organize a campaign walk for a state assembly candidate last fall.
Greb’s activity isn’t all that newsworthy, but EIA thinks his defense was. He claimed:
1) He was not a public employee.
2) As OCEA president, he was permitted by contract to contact his members about the campaign walk.
3) The district allowed the union use of school facilities and equipment for similar purposes “as a matter of practice.”
If he wasn’t a public employee, he should have been charged with trespassing on school property.